Monday, December 17, 2012

2011-2012 VEX Competition Season After-Action Review (AAR)



Task: At the conclusion of the 2011-2012 Vex Competition Season, the members of C.O.R.E. conducted an after action review in order to pass down lessons learned from this season to future club members. This process is used in order to analyze what happened, why it happened, and how it can be done better, by the participants and those responsible for the project. The results of this AAR will be critical in the preparation for the 2012/2013 VEX Competition Season.

In Attendance
Members of the Mt.SAC C.O.R.E:
Kevin Chavez, Stephen Espinoza, James Lam, Hamed Nichi, Patrix Stanley, Vincent Vendiola,
Aaron Victoria, Alejandro Weiner, Kyle Yu, and Michelle Zazueta

Location: Mount San Antonio College VEX Room, Building 61, Room 3361*
Date: 21 April 2012
Primary Task Reviewed: VEX Competition Season

Sustain: What did we do well?
§  Scouting the event to be comfortable with the surroundings 
§  Cooperation with OCC/CSUN, when our cortex malfunctioned, we borrowed their cortexes in order to compete. We showed gratitude and support for their teams in order to keep connections
§  Assigning tasks during the competition
§  Getting ideas from other schools and networking
§  Budget Management and working with the parts we already have
§  Made practice field from spare parts
§  Proving our design was plausible
§  Cross-check each other. Wake up calls in the morning and make sure everyone is on schedule

 Improve: What can we do better?
§  Time management
§  Start the engineering notebook early
§  Do not make major last minute changes to the robot or programming. There is not enough time between competitions to test.
§  Finish the mechanical work early so programmers have time to develop a full program
§  Communication: Agree as a team, don’t take things personal, be respectful, “freshmen effect” – poor cooperation and communication inherent in rookie teams,  don’t put down people’s ideas or opinions without research
§  Provide strict deadlines
§  At competition, track personnel: make sure you let people know where you are going if you leave the pit so we don’t have to scramble to find you
§  Leave the pit early enough to avoid running, VEX competitions usually run AHEAD of schedule. Be mindful of surroundings: when moving from the pit to the field, have people designated to hold on to the robot(s)
§  Top teams did designs we originally thought were unfeasible, test every idea!
§  Finish one robot before jumping to another
§  Do not split into two groups for each robot, we are one team.
§  Define leadership roles

Lessons Learned: Programming/Mechanical/Leadership
§  Test sensors separately prior to mounting
§  Limit motors used on the power expander, 4 at a time is a was a difficult load
§  Faraday Cage: Metal surrounding the VEXnet key limits reception at a distance. Use a USB A to B cable to mount the key high and away from metal.
§  Design Note: Ability to strafe without purchasing mecanum wheels
§  Have a low center of gravity to avoid tipping
§  Consider the ease of repair when designing, especially replacing clutches
§  Spread out the load on the brain to avoid frying it. Do not put heavy motors on ports 1-4 only.
§  Be comfortable with competition rules. Do not risk being out of spec; a few top teams in the finals round was disqualified for this.
§  Stay away from line sensors; they are too slow. Prefer quadratic encoders

Future Plans to Sustain the Club
§  Success book
§  Camera
§  Inventory, Clean, and Organize VEX Room
§  Collaborate with other local colleges for scrimmages
§  Build a low-cost practice field

No comments:

Post a Comment